When Does Talent Management Technology Competition Cross a Line?

Competition between talent management providers has always been fierce, especially during times of economic uncertainty, market consolidation and globalization.

It’s no surprise, then, that controversy comes up every now and again, especially as providers try to tread close to the line between gaining a competitive edge and cheating.

One of those situations is unfolding right now in the talent management solutions market. This time, it’s between Halogen and SuccessFactors, two leading talent management providers with a heritage in performance management. SuccessFactors is accusing Halogen of using fraudulent activities to obtain very sensitive competitive information.

Indeed, the accusations will raise an eyebrow or two. They include inventing a false company, complete with a false website and false procurement team and then going undercover as a false prospect customer — all in order to find out what SuccessFactors was offering its prospects in terms of pricing and implementation. Is all of this true? If so, is it creative? Is it cheating? Or both?

Similar to the Patriots’ “Videogate?”

If you’re a sports fan in my part of the world (Boston), the infamous New England Patriots “Videogate” scandal comes to mind. Were the Patriots being unfair in recording the signals from the sidelines of their competitors?

Well, yes, kind of. But there are those who will say that everybody does it, or it’s just smart competition, or if you don’t like it, don’t give away your signals. These observations are not inaccurate, but does that make them right? Typically it’s not a cut and dried argument.

As we all know, in the case of the NFL, the accusers won out and New England was penalized for its actions (though no rings or Lombardi trophies changed hands). How will it turn out between Halogen and SuccessFactors? That remains to be seen, but there are some similar questions here.

Depending on the outcome of this case, we could be entering an era where this type of competition becomes the standard in talent management. Furthermore, do the benefits outweigh the risks? For Halogen, only time will tell. SuccessFactors has filed for an injunction on using the information and several punitive damages, and Halogen has filed a motion to dismiss the case.

What are some Best Practices for healthy competition?

This type of competition might sound familiar to anyone who remembers the scandal from 2008 involving the competitive document Softscape created on SuccessFactors. Bill Kutik covers this story in an HR Executive article.

Here are some thoughts on lessons learned. There is plenty to chew on here, from either the accuser’s perspective or from the accused. No, the unfolding scenario is not a pretty picture, but it is instructive.

  • Consider your impact on the buyers’ perception. Despite the activities that vendors engage in, what matters is how this impacts the customer selection process. Below is a sample list of some of the most important factors companies consider in vendor selection:

* Price

* Functionality

* Integration

* Deep domain expertise

Article Continues Below

* Global reach

* Customer support

* Product architecture

• Security

* Delivery model

* Cultural fit

As you can see, price is usually at the top of the list. This was Halogen’s goal – to win customers over on pricing transparency. Yet, the consequences affect another important component of vendor selection — cultural fit. So, when customers are looking for a provider with values similar to their own, that controversy may affect their perception of cultural fit. That could be just as much of a deal killer as the wrong pricing, so treading the line is a risky affair.

  • Including confidentiality disclaimers. If you are a provider and you do not include necessary disclaimers until very late in the process, you may get burned. With the rise of social media and information overload, solution providers need to protect their information.
  • Enhancing research and product development. Innovation is a key theme in today’s market. Solution providers can continue to stay ahead by investing in research and product development, understanding key trends and gaining insights from industry thought leaders.
  • Improving efficiency in the sales cycle process. This goes without saying, but having a strong sales process can make or break a deal.
  • Identifying and attracting the right team. Above all, solution providers need to have the right team in place. A strong team can help to differentiate providers. It is no surprise that many providers recruit from competitors.
  • Leveraging social media. Everyone is using it. Solution providers need to create a LinkedIn group, Facebook page, and Twitter account and establish a fan base.
  • One last note: If you are in fact going to take your competitive tactics to the next level, make sure your IP addresses don’t originate from the company you are pretending not to be.

What will happen in the case between these two providers? No one knows for sure, but as competition heats up in the talent solutions space, it’s likely that companies will continue to push the envelope as far as possible to get ahead. That line between smart competition and unfair tactics will always be with us, much to the peril of the accuser.

Madeline Laurano is the Research Director, Talent Acquisition Solutions, within Aberdeen's Human Capital Management research practice, and is responsible for leading and collaborating on Aberdeen's research coverage across a range of HCM topics, including talent mobility, workforce planning, sourcing strategy, recruitment process outsourcing (RPO), employer branding, onboarding and talent acquisition. Additionally she is responsible for delivering research findings via published works, speaking engagements, on-line events, and Aberdeen's annual Human Capital Management Summit. Before joining the Aberdeen Group, Madeline was a talent systems analyst for the Newman Group, driving the company's success in the area of Talent Management Technology Evaluation and Selection. Madeline joined The Newman Group from Bersin & Associates, where she served as Principal Analyst of Talent Acquisition. Prior to joining Bersin, Madeline served as the Research Director for ERE Media where she created the ERE webinar series, published the Talent Acquisition Industry Analysis and Buyers Guide, lead the community discussion groups, and conducted various research products and services.


4 Comments on “When Does Talent Management Technology Competition Cross a Line?

  1. Madeline,
    Good points. I will add that the market for talent management has no exclusive claim to these tactics as this goes way back. I recall getting hold of a knock sheet used against my then employer by a competitor back in the early 90s. It takes many forms.

    I do want to also say that doing this to get pricing seems particularly foolhardy. One would only get MSRP up to the point that a sales contract is getting negotiated. So all this to get list prices? It is a potentially a large cost for what is fairly innocuous info. now that the cat is out of the bag.


  2. Madeline and others who have tried to take a balanced perspective to all of this — dirty tricks are dirty tricks, and no one in their right mind should buy from a vendor who practices them. Full stop. Because a vendor who behaves as Halogen is alleged to have behaved — and which must yet be proven, although I’ve now heard from several other vendors that the infamous Anna Rodriguez has shown up in their CRMs — won’t just cheat on their competitors, they are very likely to cheat on you. Call me old-fashioned, but I sure as hell don’t want to do business with folks who are sleezy or stupid, and this operation, if proven, was both.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *